Risk Analysis and Risk Management for the Artificial Superintelligence Research and Development Process

by ,

26 August 2015

Already computers can outsmart humans in specific domains, like multiplication. But humans remain firmly in control… for now. Artificial superintelligence (ASI) is AI with intelligence that vastly exceeds humanity’s across a broad range of domains. Experts increasingly believe that ASI could be built sometime in the future, could take control of the planet away from humans, and could cause a global catastrophe. Alternatively, if ASI is built safely, it may be able to solve major human problems. This paper describes how risk analysis and risk management techniques can be used to understand the possibility of ASI catastrophe and make it less likely to happen. 

Artificial superintelligence risk analysis. Risk analysis aims to understand bad events that could happen. It studies the event’s probability, severity, timing and other relevant factors. For ASI risk analysis, one technique is to model the sequences of steps that could result in ASI catastrophe. Each step can then be studied to get an overall understanding of the total risk. These models are called fault trees or event trees. Creating the models and studying each step is difficult because ASI is unprecedented technology. What’s happened in the past is of limited relevance. One way to study unprecedented events is to ask experts for their judgments on them. This is called expert elicitation. Experts don’t always get their judgments right so it’s important to ask them carefully, using established procedures from risk analysis. 

Artificial superintelligence risk management. There are two general ways to manage the risk of ASI catastrophe. One is to make ASI technology safer. This is a technical project that depends on the details of the specific ASI. The other is to manage the human process of ASI research and development, in order to steer it towards safer ASI and away from dangerous ASI. Risk management steps can be taken by governments, corporations, philanthropic foundations, and individual ASI researchers, among others. They can create regulations to restrict risky ASI research, covertly target risky ASI projects, and fund the development of ASI safety measures, among other things. Risk analysis and the related field of decision analysis can help people make better ASI risk management decisions. In particular, the analysis can help identify which options would be the most cost-effective, meaning that they would achieve the largest reduction in ASI risk for the amount of money spent on them. 

Academic citation:
Anthony M. Barrett and Seth D. Baum, 2017. Risk analysis and risk management for the artificial superintelligence research and development process. In Victor Callaghan, James Miller, Roman Yampolskiy, and Stuart Armstrong (editors), The Technological Singularity: Managing the Journey. Berlin: Springer, pages 127-140.

Download Preprint PDF • View The Technological Singularity: Managing the Journey

Image credit: Aler Kiv


This blog post was published on 28 July 2020 as part of a website overhaul and backdated to reflect the time of the publication of the work referenced here.

Recent Publications from GCRI

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

Recent Publications from GCRI

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

Recent Publications from GCRI

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

The issue of democratic backsliding has gotten extensive attention in recent years. That is the issue of countries becoming less democratic than they previously were. Often, it is discussed in terms of governments becoming more authoritarian. That is undoubtedly very...

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Depending on who you ask, the AI industry is either on track to render humans obsolete within the next few years or about to go bust, or maybe somewhere in between. This matter is among the most important questions right now, not just for global catastrophic risk but...

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

It may seem ridiculous to entertain the idea of world peace at this time. With major active wars in Ukraine, the Middle East, Myanmar, and multiple locations in Africa, plus smaller conflicts and tense relations between many countries and subnational factions, this is...

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

The Nuclear War Scenarios that Lurk Ahead in Ukraine

The Nuclear War Scenarios that Lurk Ahead in Ukraine