Outer Space
It is a small world after all, but it is a very large universe. If humanity can avoid global catastrophe, it can go on to pursue astronomically large opportunities in outer space. However, outer space is also a source of threats to life on Earth.
An Introduction to Outer Space
Outer space offers perspective. When viewing Earth from outer space, we are reminded of how small we are, but also how special we are. In the vast seas of the universe, Earth is an infinitesimal speck, but it is the only place we know to have life and intelligent civilization. We may be small, but we are doing something big. Perhaps someday Earth-life may even expand beyond our home planet across the cosmos, bringing life to an otherwise vast expanse of barren lands.
Global catastrophe threatens all of that. A global catastrophe could destroy civilization on Earth, preventing it from going on to expand across the cosmos. It could be the difference between success and failure at astronomical scales. Indeed, this is one way to define global catastrophe, as some GCRI research has done. From this perspective, this extreme big-picture perspective, reducing global catastrophic risk is of paramount importance to our era of civilization.
This raises the question of which catastrophes threaten the fate of Earth-life in the universe. The answer is uncertain. Even human extinction may not make a difference in the long-run if some other Earth species evolves the capacity for spacefaring civilization. On the other hand, a catastrophe that permanently harms human civilization without causing extinction could prevent eventual space expansion. If there is one conclusion we can reach with confidence, it is that more severe catastrophes are more likely to harm the long-term trajectory of Earth-life in the universe. Efforts to reduce the risk may proceed accordingly.
Outer space is itself a source of threats to human civilization. These include collision with near-Earth objects (asteroids, comets, and meteoroids), space weather (including solar flares and coronoal mass ejections), and stellar explosions (including supernovae and gamma-ray bursts). These risks vary widely in terms of their probability, their severity, and the opportunities for risk reduction. They also offer insights for the broader study of global catastrophic risk. For example, asteroid risk is arguably the most well-understood global catastrophic risk, but as GCRI research has shown, it still has major uncertainties; if asteroid risk remains deeply uncertain, then so too do other global catastrophic risks.
The same big-picture perspective that highlights the importance of global catastrophic risk also points to a more positive question: If humanity manages to avoid global catastrophe and becomes capable of expanding into outer space, how should we proceed? More ambitiously: Given the opportunity to turn the universe into something different, what should we do with it? These questions may seem fanciful, but in the face of rapid technological change, we may need to take them seriously. Answering them requires careful study of the ethics of outer space.
Despite the astronomical stakes, it is important not to get too carried away by outer space issues. It is also important to stay down to Earth, to stay focused on the practical, everyday decisions that we all face. A core challenge for work on global catastrophic risk, and indeed for human civilization as a whole, is to connect the dots between our everyday affairs and our cosmic potential. It is think global, act local, but for the universe instead of the planet. We should strive to successfully manage our everyday affairs while positioning our civilization for astronomical success.
Featured GCRI Publications on Outer Space
If an asteroid is found to be on collision course with Earth, it may be possible to deflect it away using nuclear explosives. This paper, published in the journal Risk Analysis, analyzes the potential tradeoff between reducing the risk of asteroid collision and increasing the risk of nuclear war or other violent conflict.
Consequentialist ethics argues that people should act so as to bring about good consequences. This paper, published in the edited collection The Ethics of Space Exploration, argues that the scale and character of outer space make it important for consequentialist ethics, for reasons related to global catastrophic risk.
Radio transmissions on Earth propagate into space. This paper, published in the journal Space Policy, evaluates radio transmissions of varying signal intensities in terms of their potential to be observed by extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI). ETI could bring large benefits or catastrophic harms to humanity, though there are great uncertainties.
Â
Full List of GCRI Publications on Outer Space
Baum, Seth D. and Andrea Owe. On the intrinsic value of diversity. Inquiry, forthcoming, DOI 10.1080/0020174X.2024.2367247.
Baum, Seth D., 2023. Assessing natural global catastrophic risks. Natural Hazards, vol. 115, no. 3 (February), pages 2699-2719, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05660-w.
Owe, Andrea, 2022. Space expansion must support sustainability - On Earth and in space. RUSI Commentary, 15 June.
Owe, Andrea, 2023. Greening the universe: The case for ecocentric space expansion. In James S. J. Schwartz, Linda Billings, and Erika Nesvold (Editors), Reclaiming Space: Progressive and Multicultural Visions of Space Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pages 325-336, DOI 10.1093/oso/9780197604793.003.0027.
Baum, Seth D., 2021. Accounting for violent conflict risk in planetary defense decisions. Acta Astronautica, vol. 178 (January), pages 15-23, DOI 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.028.
Baum, Seth D., 2019. Risk-risk tradeoff analysis of nuclear explosives for asteroid deflection. Risk Analysis, vol. 39, no. 11 (November), pages 2427-2442, DOI 10.1111/risa.13339.
Baum, Seth D., 2018. Uncertain human consequences in asteroid risk analysis and the global catastrophe threshold. Natural Hazards, vol. 94, no. 2 (November), pages 759-775, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3419-4.
Baum, Seth D., Stuart Armstrong, Timoteus Ekenstedt, Olle Häggström, Robin Hanson, Karin Kuhlemann, Matthijs M. Maas, James D. Miller, Markus Salmela, Anders Sandberg, Kaj Sotala, Phil Torres, Alexey Turchin, and Roman V. Yampolskiy, 2019. Long-term trajectories of human civilization. Foresight, vol. 21, no. 1, pages 53-83, DOI 10.1108/FS-04-2018-0037.
Baum, Seth, 2016. Space colonization and the meaning of life. Nautilus, December.
Baum, Seth D., 2016. The ethics of outer space: A consequentialist perspective. In James S.J. Schwartz and Tony Milligan (editors), The Ethics of Space Exploration. Berlin: Springer, pages 109-123.
Baum, Seth D., David C. Denkenberger, and Jacob Haqq-Misra, 2015. Isolated refuges for surviving global catastrophes. Futures, vol. 72 (September), pages 45-56, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2015.03.009.
Baum, Seth, 2015. Should nuclear devices be used to stop asteroids? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 17 June.
de Neufville, Robert, 2014. One cannot live in the cradle forever. FQXi Essay Contest, Spring.
de Neufville, Robert, 2013. The Sentinel Mission, Anthropocene blog, 17 August.
Baum, Seth, 2013. Making the universe a better place. Current Exchange/Technophilic Magazine, Spring, pages 22-23.
Haqq-Misra, Jacob, Michael W. Busch, Sanjoy M. Som, and Seth D. Baum, 2013. The benefits and harm of transmitting into space. Space Policy, vol. 29, no. 1 (February), pages 40-48, DOI 10.1016/j.spacepol.2012.11.006.
Baum, Seth D., 2013. Teaching astrobiology in a sustainability course. Journal of Sustainability Education, February issue.
An Introduction to Outer Space
Outer space offers perspective. When viewing Earth from outer space, we are reminded of how small we are, but also how special we are. In the vast seas of the universe, Earth is an infinitesimal speck, but it is the only place we know to have life and intelligent civilization. We may be small, but we are doing something big. Perhaps someday Earth-life may even expand beyond our home planet across the cosmos, bringing life to an otherwise vast expanse of barren lands.
Global catastrophe threatens all of that. A global catastrophe could destroy civilization on Earth, preventing it from going on to expand across the cosmos. It could be the difference between success and failure at astronomical scales. Indeed, this is one way to define global catastrophe, as some GCRI research has done. From this perspective, this extreme big-picture perspective, reducing global catastrophic risk is of paramount importance to our era of civilization.
This raises the question of which catastrophes threaten the fate of Earth-life in the universe. The answer is uncertain. Even human extinction may not make a difference in the long-run if some other Earth species evolves the capacity for spacefaring civilization. On the other hand, a catastrophe that permanently harms human civilization without causing extinction could prevent eventual space expansion. If there is one conclusion we can reach with confidence, it is that more severe catastrophes are more likely to harm the long-term trajectory of Earth-life in the universe. Efforts to reduce the risk may proceed accordingly.
Outer space is itself a source of threats to human civilization. These include collision with near-Earth objects (asteroids, comets, and meteoroids), space weather (including solar flares and coronoal mass ejections), and stellar explosions (including supernovae and gamma-ray bursts). These risks vary widely in terms of their probability, their severity, and the opportunities for risk reduction. They also offer insights for the broader study of global catastrophic risk. For example, asteroid risk is arguably the most well-understood global catastrophic risk, but as GCRI research has shown, it still has major uncertainties; if asteroid risk remains deeply uncertain, then so too do other global catastrophic risks.
The same big-picture perspective that highlights the importance of global catastrophic risk also points to a more positive question: If humanity manages to avoid global catastrophe and becomes capable of expanding into outer space, how should we proceed? More ambitiously: Given the opportunity to turn the universe into something different, what should we do with it? These questions may seem fanciful, but in the face of rapid technological change, we may need to take them seriously. Answering them requires careful study of the ethics of outer space.
Despite the astronomical stakes, it is important not to get too carried away by outer space issues. It is also important to stay down to Earth, to stay focused on the practical, everyday decisions that we all face. A core challenge for work on global catastrophic risk, and indeed for human civilization as a whole, is to connect the dots between our everyday affairs and our cosmic potential. It is think global, act local, but for the universe instead of the planet. We should strive to successfully manage our everyday affairs while positioning our civilization for astronomical success.
Featured GCRI Publications on Outer Space
If an asteroid is found to be on collision course with Earth, it may be possible to deflect it away using nuclear explosives. This paper, published in the journal Risk Analysis, analyzes the potential tradeoff between reducing the risk of asteroid collision and increasing the risk of nuclear war or other violent conflict.
Consequentialist ethics argues that people should act so as to bring about good consequences. This paper, published in the edited collection The Ethics of Space Exploration, argues that the scale and character of outer space make it important for consequentialist ethics, for reasons related to global catastrophic risk.
Radio transmissions on Earth propagate into space. This paper, published in the journal Space Policy, evaluates radio transmissions of varying signal intensities in terms of their potential to be observed by extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI). ETI could bring large benefits or catastrophic harms to humanity, though there are great uncertainties.
Â
Full List of GCRI Publications on Outer Space
Baum, Seth D. and Andrea Owe. On the intrinsic value of diversity. Inquiry, forthcoming, DOI 10.1080/0020174X.2024.2367247.
Baum, Seth D., 2023. Assessing natural global catastrophic risks. Natural Hazards, vol. 115, no. 3 (February), pages 2699-2719, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05660-w.
Owe, Andrea, 2022. Space expansion must support sustainability - On Earth and in space. RUSI Commentary, 15 June.
Owe, Andrea, 2023. Greening the universe: The case for ecocentric space expansion. In James S. J. Schwartz, Linda Billings, and Erika Nesvold (Editors), Reclaiming Space: Progressive and Multicultural Visions of Space Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pages 325-336, DOI 10.1093/oso/9780197604793.003.0027.
Baum, Seth D., 2021. Accounting for violent conflict risk in planetary defense decisions. Acta Astronautica, vol. 178 (January), pages 15-23, DOI 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.028.
Baum, Seth D., 2019. Risk-risk tradeoff analysis of nuclear explosives for asteroid deflection. Risk Analysis, vol. 39, no. 11 (November), pages 2427-2442, DOI 10.1111/risa.13339.
Baum, Seth D., 2018. Uncertain human consequences in asteroid risk analysis and the global catastrophe threshold. Natural Hazards, vol. 94, no. 2 (November), pages 759-775, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3419-4.
Baum, Seth D., Stuart Armstrong, Timoteus Ekenstedt, Olle Häggström, Robin Hanson, Karin Kuhlemann, Matthijs M. Maas, James D. Miller, Markus Salmela, Anders Sandberg, Kaj Sotala, Phil Torres, Alexey Turchin, and Roman V. Yampolskiy, 2019. Long-term trajectories of human civilization. Foresight, vol. 21, no. 1, pages 53-83, DOI 10.1108/FS-04-2018-0037.
Baum, Seth, 2016. Space colonization and the meaning of life. Nautilus, December.
Baum, Seth D., 2016. The ethics of outer space: A consequentialist perspective. In James S.J. Schwartz and Tony Milligan (editors), The Ethics of Space Exploration. Berlin: Springer, pages 109-123.
Baum, Seth D., David C. Denkenberger, and Jacob Haqq-Misra, 2015. Isolated refuges for surviving global catastrophes. Futures, vol. 72 (September), pages 45-56, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2015.03.009.
Baum, Seth, 2015. Should nuclear devices be used to stop asteroids? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 17 June.
de Neufville, Robert, 2014. One cannot live in the cradle forever. FQXi Essay Contest, Spring.
de Neufville, Robert, 2013. The Sentinel Mission, Anthropocene blog, 17 August.
Baum, Seth, 2013. Making the universe a better place. Current Exchange/Technophilic Magazine, Spring, pages 22-23.
Haqq-Misra, Jacob, Michael W. Busch, Sanjoy M. Som, and Seth D. Baum, 2013. The benefits and harm of transmitting into space. Space Policy, vol. 29, no. 1 (February), pages 40-48, DOI 10.1016/j.spacepol.2012.11.006.
Baum, Seth D., 2013. Teaching astrobiology in a sustainability course. Journal of Sustainability Education, February issue.