From AI for People to AI for the World and the Universe

by ,

1 December 2021

Baum, Seth D. and Andrea Owe, 2023. From AI for people to AI for the world and the universe. AI & Society, vol. 38, no. 2 (April), pages 679-680, DOI 10.1007/s00146-022-01402-5.

Download Preprint PDF

Work on the ethics of artificial intelligence often focuses on the value of AI to human populations. This is seen, for example, in initiatives on AI for People. These initiatives do well to identify some important AI ethics issues, but they fall short by neglecting the ethical importance of nonhumans. This short paper calls for AI ethics to better account for nonhumans, such as by giving initiatives names like “AI for the World” or “AI for the Universe”. The paper is part of a collection “AI for People” to be published as a special issue of the journal AI & Society.

The paper grounds its arguments in fundamental moral philosophy concepts. As the paper explains, humans are not the only entities with morally relevant attributes, such as the ability to experience pleasure and pain or the possibility of having a life worth living. The fact that nonhuman entities possess morally relevant attributes is a strong reason to morally value them.

For AI, the stakes can be quite high. Modern AI systems use a lot of energy and other resources, with significant environmental impacts. Additionally, AI technology can be used to address environmental issues, though if not used carefully, it can end up doing more harm than good. Finally, advanced future AI systems, such as runaway superintelligence, could lead to outcomes whose moral value is highly sensitive to how the AI systems account for the moral value of nonhumans.

The paper proposes a twofold effort. First, moral philosophy work on AI should recognize the moral importance of nonhumans and explore the implications of nonhumans for AI ethics. Switching to names like “AI for the World” or “AI for the Universe” is one way to start in this direction. Second, computer science work on AI ethics should develop techniques that enable AI systems to account for the moral value of nonhumans. This could include exploring proxy schemes instead of the existing observational approaches to inferring the values of moral subjects and aligning AI systems to them.

The paper contributes to a significant line of GCRI research on environmental ethics and AI. Moral consideration of nonhumans in the ethics of artificial intelligence and The ethics of sustainability for artificial intelligence document the tendency for work on AI ethics to focus on humans and call for more robust attention to nonhumans. Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability analyzes risks associated with near-term applications of AI in sectors related to environmental sustainability such as agriculture and forestry. Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence discusses how to handle nonhumans within common AI ethics paradigms. Finally, Artificial intelligence needs environmental ethics calls for environmental ethicists to contribute their perspectives to AI ethics.

Academic citation:

Baum, Seth D. and Andrea Owe, 2023. From AI for people to AI for the world and the universe. AI & Society, vol. 38, no. 2 (April), pages 679-680, DOI 10.1007/s00146-022-01402-5.

Download Preprint PDFView in AI & SocietyView in ReadCube

Image credit: Pixabay

Related Topics:

Recent Publications from GCRI

Climate Change, Uncertainty, and Global Catastrophic Risk

Climate Change, Uncertainty, and Global Catastrophic Risk

Assessing the Risk of Takeover Catastrophe from Large Language Models

Assessing the Risk of Takeover Catastrophe from Large Language Models

On the Intrinsic Value of Diversity

On the Intrinsic Value of Diversity

Recent Publications from GCRI

Climate Change, Uncertainty, and Global Catastrophic Risk

Climate Change, Uncertainty, and Global Catastrophic Risk

Download PDF Preprint Is climate change a global catastrophic risk? Warming temperatures are already causing a variety harms around the world, some quite severe, and they project to worsen as temperatures increase. However, despite the massive body of research on...

On the Intrinsic Value of Diversity

On the Intrinsic Value of Diversity

Download PDF Preprint Diversity is an important ethical concept. It’s also relevant to global catastrophic risk in at least two ways: the risk of catastrophic biodiversity loss and the need for diversity among people working on global catastrophic risk. It’s...

Climate Change, Uncertainty, and Global Catastrophic Risk

Climate Change, Uncertainty, and Global Catastrophic Risk

Assessing the Risk of Takeover Catastrophe from Large Language Models

Assessing the Risk of Takeover Catastrophe from Large Language Models

On the Intrinsic Value of Diversity

On the Intrinsic Value of Diversity

Manipulating Aggregate Societal Values to Bias AI Social Choice Ethics

Manipulating Aggregate Societal Values to Bias AI Social Choice Ethics

Recent Publications from GCRI

Climate Change, Uncertainty, and Global Catastrophic Risk

Climate Change, Uncertainty, and Global Catastrophic Risk

Download PDF Preprint Is climate change a global catastrophic risk? Warming temperatures are already causing a variety harms around the world, some quite severe, and they project to worsen as temperatures increase. However, despite the massive body of research on...

On the Intrinsic Value of Diversity

On the Intrinsic Value of Diversity

Download PDF Preprint Diversity is an important ethical concept. It’s also relevant to global catastrophic risk in at least two ways: the risk of catastrophic biodiversity loss and the need for diversity among people working on global catastrophic risk. It’s...

Climate Change, Uncertainty, and Global Catastrophic Risk

Climate Change, Uncertainty, and Global Catastrophic Risk

Assessing the Risk of Takeover Catastrophe from Large Language Models

Assessing the Risk of Takeover Catastrophe from Large Language Models

On the Intrinsic Value of Diversity

On the Intrinsic Value of Diversity

Manipulating Aggregate Societal Values to Bias AI Social Choice Ethics

Manipulating Aggregate Societal Values to Bias AI Social Choice Ethics