On the Promotion of Safe and Socially Beneficial Artificial Intelligence

by

10 October 2017

As AI becomes more and more capable, its impacts on society are also getting larger. AI is now being used in medicine, transportation (self-driving cars), the military (drones), and many other sectors. The impacts of AI on society depend a lot on how the AI is designed. To improve AI design, two challenges must be met. There is the technical challenge of developing safe and beneficial technology designs, and there is the social challenge of ensuring that such designs are used. This paper studies the social challenge of how to promote safe and socially beneficial AI designs (or simply “beneficial AI” for short). The paper looks at both near-term and long-term AI, including the possibility of future AI being superintelligent: significantly more intelligent and more capable than humans. There has been little prior research on promoting beneficial AI, so the paper uses examples from other contexts that have been studied more, such as environmental protection.

Extrinsic measures. Most efforts to promote beneficial AI focus on extrinsic measures, which are imposed on AI communities from the outside. Government regulations and institutional policies are some common forms of extrinsic measures. Extrinsic measures can be in the form of constraints, in which certain AI designs are required or forbidden, or in the form of incentives, in which certain AI designs are encouraged or discouraged. Extrinsic measures are generally built on the premise that AI designers do not want to choose beneficial designs—otherwise, the measures wouldn’t be needed. Therefore, the measures generally require mechanisms for ensuring compliance and punishing noncompliance.

Intrinsic aspects of extrinsic measures. Extrinsic measures cause reactions within AI communities. These reactions are the intrinsic aspects of extrinsic measures. The reactions can determine whether the extrinsic measure is successful at making AI more beneficial. Some extrinsic measures cause positive reactions, making them succeed with minimal enforcement. For example, laws requiring dog owners to cleanup after their dogs are generally successful even though they are rarely enforced. Other extrinsic measures cause negative reactions, making them less successful. Some extrinsic measures can even backfire, causing worse outcomes than if there was no measure. For example, it is sometimes believed that a constitutional amendment to ban flag burning would result in more people burning flags because it would turn flag burning into a protest against government repression of free speech. In order for extrinsic measures for AI to succeed at benefiting society, it is important that they be designed in consideration of intrinsic aspects.

Dedicated intrinsic measures. Beneficial AI can also be promoted via dedicated intrinsic measures, which motivate AI developers to want to pursue beneficial designs. There are several types of dedicated intrinsic measures. For example, social norms can be cultivated within AI communities such that they think they should pursue beneficial AI. Respected messengers can be used to deliver messages so that AI developers are more likely to listen. Messages can be framed in ways that make beneficial AI more appealing. Stigmas can be applied to AI that is not beneficial. These and other dedicated intrinsic measures can be a powerful way to promote beneficial AI.

Academic citation:
Seth D. Baum, 2017. On the promotion of safe and socially beneficial artificial intelligence. AI & Society, vol. 32, no. 4 (November), pages 543-551, DOI 10.1007/s00146-016-0677-0.

Download Preprint PDFView in AI & SocietyView in ReadCube

Image credit: United States Marine Corps


This blog post was published on 28 July 2020 as part of a website overhaul and backdated to reflect the time of the publication of the work referenced here.

Recent Publications from GCRI

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

Recent Publications from GCRI

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

Recent Publications from GCRI

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

The issue of democratic backsliding has gotten extensive attention in recent years. That is the issue of countries becoming less democratic than they previously were. Often, it is discussed in terms of governments becoming more authoritarian. That is undoubtedly very...

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Depending on who you ask, the AI industry is either on track to render humans obsolete within the next few years or about to go bust, or maybe somewhere in between. This matter is among the most important questions right now, not just for global catastrophic risk but...

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

It may seem ridiculous to entertain the idea of world peace at this time. With major active wars in Ukraine, the Middle East, Myanmar, and multiple locations in Africa, plus smaller conflicts and tense relations between many countries and subnational factions, this is...

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Democratic Participation and Global Catastrophic Risk

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Parsing AI Risk in Early 2025

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

Advance World Peace to Address Global Catastrophic Risk?

The Nuclear War Scenarios that Lurk Ahead in Ukraine

The Nuclear War Scenarios that Lurk Ahead in Ukraine